John Donne – Death’s Duell –
Beginning of Lent 1630
Psalm 68:20 “Unto God the Lord belong
the issues of death, i.e. from death
Our Critical
day is not the very day of our death: but the whole course of our life. I thank
him that prays for me when my bell tolls, but I thank him much more that catechizes
me, or preaches to me, or instructs me how to live. There is my security - the mouth of the Lord hath said it – “Do
this and thou shalt live”: But God never mentions, never seems to consider
death, the bodily natural death. God doth not say, “Live well and thou shalt
die well,” that is an easy, a quiet death; but live well here, and thou shalt
live well forever. As the first part of a sentence pieces well with the last,
and never respects, never hearkens after the parenthesis that comes between, so
doth a good life here flow into an eternal life, without any consideration,
what manner of death we die: But whether the gate of my prison be opened with
an old key (by a gentle and preparing sickness) or the gate be hewn down by a
violent death, or the gate be burnt down by a raging and frantic fever, a gate
into heaven I shall have, for from the Lord is the cause of my life, and with
God the Lord are the issues[1] of
death. … This issue of death is God’s care that the soul be safe, whatever
agonies the body suffers in the hour of death; there is a deliverance by the
death of another, by the death of Christ.
[2]…Now
see the end of the Lord, which is not that end that the Lord proposed to
himself (salvation to us) nor the end which he proposes to us (conformity to
him) but see the end of the Lord, the end that the Lord himself came to, death,
and a painful and shameful death. But why did he die? And why die so? Because
to this God our Lord belonged the issues of death. What can be more obvious, more manifest then
the sense of these words? In former part of this verse, it is said, “He that is
our God, is the God of salvation,” God must save us: who can that be but Jesus?
Therefore that name was given him, because he was to save us. And to this
Jesus, this Saviour, belongs the issues of death. Being come into this life in
our mortal nature, he could not go out of it any other way then by Death.
Therefore it is said, “To God the Lord belong the issues of death”; to show
that his way to save us was to die. …More cannot be said, then Christ himself
said of himself, “These things Christ ought to suffer.” He had no other way but
by death. So then, this part of our Sermon must needs be a passion sermon;
since all his life was a continual passion, all our Lent may well be a
continual Good Friday. Christ’s painful life took off none of the pains of his
death, he felt not the less then for having felt so much before. Nor will
anything that shall be said before, lessen, but rather enlarge your devotion,
to that which shall be said of his passion at the time of the due solemnization
thereof. Christ bled not a drop the less at the last, for having bled at his
Circumcision before, nor will you shed a tear the less then, if you shed some
now. Therefore, be now content to
consider with me how this God the Lord belonged the issues of death.
That God,
this Lord, the Lord of life could die, is a strange contemplation; That the Red
Sea could be dry, that the sun could stand still, that an oven could be seven
times heat and not burn, that lions could be hungry and not bite, is strange,
miraculously strange, but it is super miraculous that God could die; but that
God would die is an exaltation of that. But even of that, also it is a super
exaltation, that God should die, must die, and all this Christ ought to suffer,
was bound to suffer. David said, “God is
the God of revenges,” he would not pass over the sin of man unrevenged,
unpunished. But then the God of revenge works freely, he punishes, he spares
whom he will. And would he not spare
himself? He would not; love is strong as death, stronger, it drew in death that
naturally is not welcome.[3] …
He would not
spare, nay he could not spare himself. There was nothing freer, more voluntary,
more spontaneous then the death of Christ. He died voluntarily, but yet when we
consider the contract that had passed between his Father and him, there was a
kind of necessity upon him. All this Christ ought to suffer. And when shall we
date this obligation? Certainly, this decree, by which Christ was to suffer all
this, was an eternal decree and was there anything before that, which was
eternal? Infinite love, eternal love, he pleased to follow this home, and to
consider it seriously, that what liberty we can conceive in Christ, to die or
not to die; this necessity of dying, this decree is as eternal as that liberty;
and yet how small a matter made he of this necessity and this dying? His Father
calls it but a bruising of his heel (the serpent shall bruise his heel) and yet
that was, that the serpent should practice and compass his death. Himself calls
it but a Baptism, as though he were to be the better for it. “I have a Baptism
to be baptized with,” and he was in pain until it was accomplished, and yet
this Baptism was his death. The Holy
Ghost calls it Joy (for the Joy which was set before him he endured the Cross)
which was not a joy of his reward after his passion, but a joy that filled him
even in the midst of those torments, [a joy that arose from those torments.] …[4] When
Christ calls his passion a cup and no worse, (can ye drink of my cup?) he
speaks not odiously, not with detestation of it: Indeed, it was a cup, a health
to all the world. And says David, “What shall I render to the Lord?” David
answers, “I will take the cup of salvation”; take it, that cup of salvation,
his passion, if not into your present imitation, yet into your present
contemplation. And behold how that Lord that was God, yet could die, would die,
must die, for your salvation.
That Moses and
Elijah talked with Christ in the transfiguration, both St. Matthew and St. Mark
tell us, but what they talked of, only St. Luke, “They talked of his decease,
of his death which was to be accomplished at Jerusalem.” The word is of his Exodus,
the very word of our text, “his issue by death.” Moses who in his Exodus had
prefigured this issue of our Lord, and in passing Israel out of Egypt through
the Red Sea, had foretold in that actual prophesy, Christ’s passing of mankind
through the Sea of his Blood. And Elijah, whose Exodus and issue out of this
world was a figure of Christ’s ascension, had no doubt a great satisfaction in
talking with our blessed Lord of the full consummation of all this in his
death…. Our meditation of his death should be visceral and affect us more
because it is of a thing already done. The ancient Romans had a certain
tenderness, and detestation of the name of death, they could not name death,
no, not in their wills. There they could not say “not if,” or “when I die,” but
when the course of nature is accomplished upon me. To us that speak daily of
the death of Christ, (he was crucified, dead and buried) can the memory or the
mention of our own death be irksome or bitter?[5] …Moses
and Elijah talked with Christ of his death, only in a holy and joyful sense of
the benefit, which they and all the world were to receive by that. Discourses of Religion should not be out of
curiosity, but to edification. And then they talked with Christ of his death at
that time, when he was in the greatest height of glory that ever he admitted in
this world, that is, his transfiguration. And we are afraid to speak to the great
men of this world of their death, but nourish in them a vain imagination of
immortality, and immutability. But, as St. Peter said, “It is good to dwell
here” in consideration of his death, and therefore transfer we our devotions
through some of those steps which God the Lord made to his issue of death that
day.
Take in the
whole day from the hour that Christ received the Passover upon Thursday, unto
the hour in which he died the next day in thy devotion, and consider what he
did, and remember what you have done. Before he instituted and celebrated the
Sacrament, he proceeded to that act of humility, to wash his disciples feet,
even Peters, who for a while resisted him; In thy preparation to the holy and
blessed Sacrament, hast thou with a sincere humility sought a reconciliation
with all the world, even with those that have been averse from it, and refused
that reconciliation from thee? If so thou hast spent that first part of this
his last day, in a conformity with him. After the Sacrament, he spent the time
till night in prayer, in preaching, in Psalms; hast thou considered that a worthy
receiving of the Sacrament consists in a continuation of holiness after, as
well as in a preparation before? If so, thou hast therein also conformed thy
self to him, so Christ spent his time till night. At night, he went into the
garden to pray, and he prayed much. How much? …It is collected that he spent three
hours in prayer. I dare scarce ask thee
whither thou went or how thou disposed of thy self, when it grew dark last
night: If that time were spent in a holy recommendation of thy self to God, and
a submission of thy will to his, it was spent in conformity to him.[6] … About
midnight he was taken and bound with a kiss, art thou not too conformable to
him in that? Is not that too literally, too exactly thy case? At midnight to
have been taken and bound with a kiss? From thence he was carried back to
[1] “Deliverance”, “escape”
[2] Preceding sentence: Saint James said, “You have heard of the patience of Job.” For in every man - calamitous, miserable man - a Job speaks;
[3] Donne continues, “Christ said, “If it be possible, let this cup pass,” when his love expressed in a former decree with his Father, had made it impossible. Many waters quench not love, Christ tried many; he was baptized out of his love, and his love determined not there; he wept over Jerusalem out of his love, and his love determined not there; he mingled blood with water in his agony and that determined not his love; he wept pure blood, all his blood at all his eyes, at all his pores, in his flagellation and thorns and these expressed, but did not quench his love. ”
[4] “and arose from them.”
[5] “There are in these latter times amongst us, that name death freely enough, and the death of God, but in blasphemous oaths and execrations. Miserable men, who shall therefore be said never to have named Jesus, because they have named him too often; and therefore hear Jesus say, “I never knew you,” because they made themselves too familiar with him.”
[6] “In that time and in those prayers was his agony and bloody sweat. I will hope that thou dist pray; but not every ordinary and customary prayer, but prayer actually accompanied with shedding of tears and dispositively in a readiness to shed blood for his glory in necessary cases, puts thee into a conformity with him.”